{"id":541,"date":"2013-10-23T00:18:18","date_gmt":"2013-10-23T00:18:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/greatapes.ca\/blog\/?p=541"},"modified":"2013-10-23T00:19:43","modified_gmt":"2013-10-23T00:19:43","slug":"does-google-autocomplete-really-reveal-sexism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/greatapes.ca\/blog\/2013\/10\/does-google-autocomplete-really-reveal-sexism\/","title":{"rendered":"Does Google Autocomplete Really Reveal Sexism?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>U.N. Women recently started an ad campaign using Google&#8217;s autocomplete feature to demonstrate the pervasiveness of sexism worldwide.\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.adweek.com\/adfreak\/powerful-ads-use-real-google-searches-show-scope-sexism-worldwide-153235\">The campaign was covered in AdWeek<\/a>, which is where I think most people first heard about it.\u00a0 It is undoubtedly true that sexism is a powerful force in pretty much every country on Earth and I think it is a moral imperative that we try to overturn that state of affairs.\u00a0 But that doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean that this particular instance means what people are making it out to mean.\u00a0 I think there&#8217;s good reason to be skeptical of what this campaign alleges.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->Let&#8217;s start with a simple question: What kind of person begins a web search with a phrase like &#8220;women should&#8221; or &#8220;women need to&#8221;?\u00a0 Does that sound like the beginning of a search that a non-sexist person would enter?\u00a0 Well, maybe a non-sexist person would search &#8220;women should be paid as much as men.&#8221;\u00a0 But it&#8217;s probably more likely that that person would search &#8220;pay equity&#8221;, isn&#8217;t it?\u00a0 A phrase like &#8220;women need to&#8221; is prescriptive, and I would generally expect that you&#8217;re probably pretty sexist if you&#8217;re the kind of person who enters a search that essentially sounds like an order to an entire gender.\u00a0 This ad campaign is using loaded phrases that are predisposed toward a certain result; of course the autofills are sexist, the phrases they&#8217;re choosing are practically sexist to begin with!<\/p>\n<p>What happens when you try the same thing with less loaded search terms?\u00a0 Here&#8217;s the autocomplete I got for &#8220;women like&#8221;:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/greatapes.ca\/blog\/2013\/10\/does-google-autocomplete-really-reveal-sexism\/women_like\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-542\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter  wp-image-542\" alt=\"women_like\" src=\"http:\/\/greatapes.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/women_like.png\" width=\"582\" height=\"119\" srcset=\"http:\/\/greatapes.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/women_like.png 727w, http:\/\/greatapes.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/women_like-300x61.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 582px) 100vw, 582px\" \/><\/a>The first one is Google misunderstanding what I meant and suggesting a song.\u00a0 The 2nd and 4th results are for an &#8220;organization to encourage, empower and engage women and girls to make a difference locally and globally&#8221; according to Us Foundation web site.\u00a0 &#8220;Women like beards&#8221; is kind of funny and not especially sexist.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s another more neutral search string I thought up:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/greatapes.ca\/blog\/2013\/10\/does-google-autocomplete-really-reveal-sexism\/women_in\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-544\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter  wp-image-544\" alt=\"women_in\" src=\"http:\/\/greatapes.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/women_in.png\" width=\"553\" height=\"126\" srcset=\"http:\/\/greatapes.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/women_in.png 691w, http:\/\/greatapes.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/women_in-300x68.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 553px) 100vw, 553px\" \/><\/a>&#8220;Women in yoga pants&#8221; seems to lead to a bunch of pages full of creepshots, so that&#8217;s definitely troubling.\u00a0 But &#8220;women in combat&#8221; and &#8220;women in the bible&#8221; aren&#8217;t especially sexist (depending on how they&#8217;re handled) and &#8220;women in distress&#8221; leads to web sites for an organisation that helps women who have been victims of domestic violence.\u00a0 Autocomplete suggests more reasonable responses to more neutral search strings.<\/p>\n<p>I think you could take this a step further than I did above: if a search term starts by specifying a gender, wouldn&#8217;t you expect to be somewhat likely to get essentialising results?\u00a0 Unless you&#8217;re searching for a fairly specific topic where gender really is the determining factor, any search that seeks to yield results about half the population is probably going to return some pretty lousy results.\u00a0 [As an example of a specific topic where gender is a determining factor, &#8220;women in science&#8221; results in autocompletes that are entirely sensible.]<\/p>\n<p>So does Google autocomplete really demonstrate a global problem with sexism?\u00a0 I&#8217;m not so sure it does, at least not on the basis of what&#8217;s presented in the U.N.&#8217;s campaign.\u00a0 Sexism certainly <em>is<\/em> a problem globally, but looking at search terms that are predisposed toward returning sexist results is probably not the best way to highlight the problem.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>U.N. Women recently started an ad campaign using Google&#8217;s autocomplete feature to demonstrate the pervasiveness of sexism worldwide.\u00a0 The campaign was covered in AdWeek, which is where I think most people first heard about it.\u00a0 It is undoubtedly true that sexism is a powerful force in pretty much every country on Earth and I think [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[15,9],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/greatapes.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/541"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/greatapes.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/greatapes.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/greatapes.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/greatapes.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=541"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"http:\/\/greatapes.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/541\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":550,"href":"http:\/\/greatapes.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/541\/revisions\/550"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/greatapes.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=541"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/greatapes.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=541"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/greatapes.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=541"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}